Political Views, Political Opinions, Political Positions, Conservative Politics
POLITICAL SCANDALS
Is Obama Gay?
« Previous Scandal Articles


INS DOC FOUND: U.S. CERTIFICATE ISSUED TO ONE EAST AFRICAN-BORN CHILD OF U.S. CITIZEN IN 1961!

(Editors Note: this article was sent in as a partial response to Helen’s article below, which she says proves Obama was born a US citizen. We welcome others).

Friday, March 23, 2012

IMPLICATIVE DISCOVERY: A government document found buried in the online reference section of a Boston Public Library archive bolsters a growing mountain of evidentiary data against Barack Obama’s constitutional eligibility to be president. The document indicates that a consular officer issued a single certificate of statutory citizenship, within the time frame including August 4, 1961, to a child born to a U.S. citizen between July 1st and December 31st, 1961 in the Kenyan region of Africa. The record also reveals that the certificate was the only one issued for this specific type of arrival in the U.S. over a span of more than 18 months, among thousands from other parts of the world.

By Dan Crosby
of THE DAILY PEN

NEW YORK, NY – A recently discovered rare immigration record found by researchers working on behalf of an ongoing investigation into the Constitutional eligibility of Barack Obama to hold the office of the U.S. presidency reveals that an American consular officer issued a single Certificate of Citizenship to only one passenger arriving in the U.S. from the Kenyan region of Africa between July and December of 1961.

The record shows demographic and status classifications for a passenger who was explicitly recorded at the INS Arrival Inspection Station as an individual being born to a U.S. citizen parent arriving from the Kenyan region of Africa between July 1st and December 31st, 1961.

This information and the dates of its documentation are disturbing given the rare nature of the issuance of certificates of citizenship for children who acquire their citizenship by birth to incoming U.S. citizens in this particular region of Africa.

Read about “Acquired Citizenship”: http://www.kterry.com/citizenship/certofcitizenship.htm#acquired

These dates not only align with the alleged date of Obama’s birth on August 4, 1961, but also with evidence indicating that Ann Dunham departed from Hawaii beginning in February, 1961, shortly after her undocumented marriage to Obama Sr. The table below shows there were a total of 13 children of U.S. citizens who entered the U.S. from Africa’s Kenyan region. It also shows there were 11 from the United Kingdom in the same time in comparison, to demonstrate the consistency of this class of arrivals, regardless of the country of embarkation.

These children were classified by the INS upon arrival based on a passport which already named them when they departed from the U.S. prior, or they received requisite documentation, pre-approved by the U.S. before embarkation, which identified them specifically as children of U.S. citizens who were up to 18 years old.

However, a child who enters the U.S. who was not named on a passport prior to the use of that passport to depart the U.S. must undergo another form of identification process upon returning. A child who did not exist when the parent departed the U.S., in the absence of a passport, must be classified as one of three definitions, a non-resident alien, a derived citizen by parentage or marriage, or a child with acquired citizenship by birth or legal adoption by a U.S. citizen. The following table shows the quantity of children who were granted acquired citizenship from Africa.

Also supporting this data is the implication of an African trip by the absence of Dunham’s passport information which is known to have existed from the 1960s, but which was said by State Department officials to have been conveniently discarded as a part of an administrative order to make more file storage space in the 1980s.

We know Dunham used a passport at that time on at least one occasion for her departure with Obama Jr. to Indonesia where the two lived with Lolo Soetoro, Dunham’s second husband. If Dunham had filed for a “renewal” of an old passport, rather than for a new passport in the mid 1960’s for the Indonesian trip, which would have been the common practice for the life of a passport, this would have been indicated on the missing application which would have been included with the series of documents released by an FOIA request in early 2010.

The Immigration and Naturalization Service published its annual Report of the Immigration and Naturalization Service in 1963, for the year of July 1st, 1961 ending on June 30th, 1962. According to information on page 99 of the report the only certificate of acquired citizenry issued based on the grounds of birth to a U.S. citizen abroad was coincidentally also issued in the same time frame during which Barack Obama’s alleged birth date occurred on August 4th, 1961.
http://archive.org/stream/annualreportofim1962unit#page/99/mode/1up

Successive yearly reports add COC recipients to their roster for births in previous years as applicants receive those certificates for the year they were born. Table 48 shows the total COCs issued in that year (larger number on the left for each region under “Total”) for those born under past years’ columns. The quantity of recipients with births in each year tend to peak in the fourth year after the birth, according to the report.

COCs are more rarely issued in the same year unless the U.S. citizen parent returns to the U.S. more immediately after the birth. Obviously, the sooner U.S. citizen parent(s) return with their children born abroad, the sooner they would receive the COC after the birth. However, very few COCs (about one in 80) are issued to children the same year the report is published because most children born abroad to U.S. parent(s) don’t return to the U.S. for three to five years, according to the report data.

COC delivery is also often delayed while the circumstances of the birth abroad are confirmed for older births who might apply for retroactive COC. However, when a newborn or very young child enters the U.S. bearing a foreign birth registration from an official medical facility or institution identifying the citizen parent, a COC is able to be expedited based on the registration form, the parent(s) testimony and inspection of the child by the INS. In those cases, a COC may be delivered in days, not months or years.

According to the INS, Certificates of Citizenship are issued upon arrival in the U.S. to those who have acquired statutory citizenship (not natural-born citizenship) by birth to at least one U.S. citizen parent within the previous year while that parent(s) was temporarily in another country. COC are notifications provided by the American Consulate Service, via the INS, to individuals born to at least one U.S. citizen abroad in order to provide interim citizen alien status while immigration status is processed and secured. COC are not issued to natural-born citizens or children born to non-U.S. citizen parents arriving in the U.S., nor are COC received through the same process as required for naturalized citizenship, according to the INS.

http://archive.org/stream/annualreportofim1962unit#page/14/mode/1up

A COAC is issued to an arriving child from abroad who is:

- born abroad to one U.S. citizen parent and one parent with “alien” non-citizen status, or
- born in the U.S. to two alien parents who both naturalize after the child’s birth, or
- born abroad to a U.S. citizen who did not live in (or come to) the United States for a period of time prior to the child’s birth, or
- adopted and is permanently residing in the United States and can become a U.S. citizen by action of law on the date on which all of the following requirements have been met:
- The child was lawfully admitted for permanent residence; and
- Either parent was a United States citizen by birth or naturalization; and
- The child was still under 18 years of age; and
- The child was not married; and
- The child was the parent’s legitimate child or was legitimated by the parent before the child’s 16th birthday (Stepchildren or children born out of wedlock who were not legitimated before their 16th birthday do not derive United States citizenship through their parents.); and
- If adopted, the child met the requirements of section 101(b)(1)(E) or (F) and has had a full and final adoption; and
- The child was residing in the United States in the legal custody of the U.S. citizen parent (this includes joint custody).

There is yet other historical documented evidence supporting the plausibility that Ann Dunham possessed a birth registration for Obama Jr. from Kenya. In 2009, divorce decree documents for Dunham and Obama Sr. revealed that a conspicuously missing page from the section of the court proceedings declaring the custody of Obama Jr. is the same page which corresponds to other divorce records where a birth certificate would be required by a judge in order to determine original parentage at birth for a custody ruling based on HRS 571.

As previously reported by Dr. Jerome Corsi of WND and other sources, the void of documented and testimonial evidence accounting for Ann Dunham’s presence in Hawaii between February and early August of 1961 implies that she had reasons to travel to Kenya shortly after her undocumented marriage to Obama’s alleged father in February of 1961. According to the widely accepted but highly suspicious uncorroborated account of events, Dunham would have been at least three months pregnant at the time of the marriage. It was documented that Obama Sr’s father, living in Kenya at the time, denounced the marriage leaving the couple with a reconciliatory reason to travel there.

Following the completion of her classes at the University of Hawaii in winter 1961, the only evidence accounting for Dunham’s presence was months after the alleged marriage, in late August 1961. A transcript of registration to attend fall extension classes at the University of Washington, in Seattle, beginning in late August, 1961 was discovered in 2009.

The previous year’s INS report shows that no other Certificates of Citizenry by birth were issued to anyone arriving from the Kenyan region of Africa between July 1st, 1960 and June 30th, 1961. During this time, the INS recorded 282 alien arrivals from Kenya by air, and three U.S. citizens.

The arrival of these Kenyan aliens is corroborated by the African American Students Foundation Report of Activities 1959-1961 which documents the arrival of African students in the U.S. on September 7, 1960 from Nairobi, Kenya via the second sortie of the Airlift America Project, a project initiated in April 1959 by the AASF and Kenyan politician, Tom Mboya, to bring African students from Nairobi to study in the U.S.

However, the INS report appears to fail to account for 13 other passengers which were reported as members of the AASF transport from Kenya. The AASF Report states there were 295 passengers aboard the flights, not 282.

Of the 2397 arrivals from Africa who were originally classified by the INS as “Aliens” between July 1, 1961 and June 30, 1962, only one was from Kenya. INS procedures dictate that arrivals under the age of 18 not possessing a U.S. passport are issued “alien” status until the alleged parents of the child are officially issued a Certificate of Citizenry. The Certificate of Citizenry can then be used in conjunction with state birth registration procedures to acquire a birth certificate for the child.

It should noted that the AASF sent more than 800 students to the United States via the Airlift Project from East Africa in the early 1960s. Some of the student are not accounted by the 1961-1962 Immigration report as having departed from Kenya in the third airlift transport in fall of 1961. However, several of these students attended the University of Chicago where it has been widely speculated they had expenses paid for by six separate U.S. families including the family of Tom and Mary Ayers, parents of domestic terrorist and long-time Obama affiliate, Bill Ayers, with whom Obama served on the Annenberg Education Project Fund board for almost 10 years.

Recent testimony from a retired postal worker who delivered mail to the Ayers’ Glen Ellyn, Chicago residence collaborates with AASF report accounts and indicates the Ayers may have a longer history of supporting foreign exchange students than initially suspected. Barack Obama II, was likely one of these foreign students supported by the Ayers in the late 1980s which would explain his engagement to serve with Ayers on the Annenberg Fund board, perhaps as appreciation for the Ayers’ help.

A COC is also considered a primary form of identification by the State of Hawaii in 1961 to prove a foreign born infant’s residency in the U.S. prompting the issuance of a standard Certificate of Live Birth under Hawaii Revised Statute 338-17 which would then allocate the location of the birth to the mother’s residence.

Corroborating data from passenger arrivals of flights entering the U.S. between July 1st, 1961 and June 30th, 1962 indicates this one individual may have been originally classified as an alien upon arrival prior to application for derivative citizenship. The INS report shows there was only one individual who was originally classified by the INS as an alien arriving by air from Kenya. This individual was possibly inspected by INS officers in Hawaii upon arrival at the INS station located within Honolulu International Airport sometime in early August of 1961.

Unfortunately, the report does not give data supporting that this individual was accompanied by a U.S. citizen parent. This may be explained by the disparity of time between being classified as an “alien” in the interim until a COAC was granted and the collection of data for this report’s date of publication.

According to the INS report data, a voluntary birth to a U.S. resident in Africa in 1961, away from the quality of care offered at U.S. hospitals was extremely rare with only eight such cases in more than two years. The rarity of this event would leave an easily referenced recording of the birth abroad. Hawaiian law also specifies that documentation used to issue birth certificates by the Hawaiian Health Department includes certificates of citizenship issued by the Immigration and Naturalization Service upon arrival of children born to U.S. citizens abroad.

INS DOC FOUND

Bookmark and Share
Please click here to go to our Home Page. Lots of new, good stuff there.

7 comments on “INS DOC FOUND: U.S. CERTIFICATE ISSUED TO ONE EAST AFRICAN-BORN CHILD OF U.S. CITIZEN IN 1961!

  1. ehancock on said:

    A grand total of 21 people came to the USA from Kenya in 1961 according to INS records. There is no evidence in Kenya that Obama’s mother ever arrived there. There is no evidence in INS records that Obama’s mother left the USA or returned to the USA or that Obama did. It was a terribly expensive trip (and Obama’s parents were not rich, nor were the grandparents) and WND has proven with a FOI Act request that Obama’s father was in fact in Hawaii on August 4, 1961—so if Obama’s mother had traveled, it would have had to have been alone, and how likely is that?

    And there is the Hawaii birth certificate for Obama, whose facts have repeatedly been confirmed by the officials in Hawaii, and further confirmed by the Index Data (a public file listing the birth certificates that are on file, which shows one for Obama under 1961) and by the birth notices in the Hawaii newspapers which at the time were only sent to the papers by the DOH of Hawaii, and the DOH at the time only sent out those notices for births in Hawaii.

  2. ehancock on said:

    Re: “Hawaiian Health Department includes certificates of citizenship issued by the Immigration and Naturalization Service upon arrival of children born to U.S. citizens abroad.”

    Who told you that? It is wrong.

    Hawaii law does not now and NEVER did allow a birth certificate to be issued with the words “born in Honolulu” (as Obama’s does) unless the child was actually born in Honolulu. And in 1961, when Obama was born, the law did not allow the DOH to issue a birth certificate to anyone unless she or he was actually born in Hawaii.

  3. Ellen on said:

    There was ONE birth of an American citizen in Kenya, and you nuts think it had to have been Obama.

    That despite the fact that only 21 people total came from Kenya to the USA in 1961, and despite the enormous expense of a Hawaii-Kenya trip (no direct flights) and the despite the fact that there is no evidence in Kenya that Obama’s mother was ever there, and despite the birth certificate for Obama in Hawaii–whose facts have been repeatedly confirmed by the officials in Hawaii, the Index Data and the notices in the Hawaii newspapers.

  4. Ellen on said:

    That should read:

    There was ONE birth of an American citizen in Kenya, and you nuts think it had to have been Obama.

    And you do that despite the fact that only 21 people total came from Kenya to the USA in 1961, and despite the enormous expense of a Hawaii-Kenya trip (no direct flights) and the despite the fact that there is no evidence in Kenya that Obama’s mother was ever there, and despite the birth certificate for Obama in Hawaii—–whose facts have been repeatedly confirmed by the officials in Hawaii, by the Index Data and by the notices in the Hawaii newspapers.

  5. Ellen on said:

    Re: “It has been widely speculated.”
    Speculation is not facts, and birthers tend to speculate in one way only.

  6. asanford on said:

    Ellen:

    It is clear that you have spent a huge amount of time memorizing the packed White House line on Obama’s eligibility. If the guy (not man) himself came up to you and showed you his Kenyan birth certificate, you’d tell him he was wrong. Your position is set in stone and will not even contemplate a shift in that position. There is no hope for you, just as there is no hope for the unthinking people who don’t know the facts in the situation, but blindly condemn Obama as a foreign born national.

    I recently wrote an article for The DC Post, in which I said, essentially, that it does not matter whether you believe that gravity doesn’t exist, which means you can fly. When you jump off a 6 story building, secure in the belief you can fly, the base line truths of the situation will click in, and you will be splattered on the concrete, beliefs and all.

    Your Barack guy will take you down with the rest of us, if we don’t stop him, unless yhou are one of his inner circle people who has made huge amounts of taxpayer money through his corrupt policies. Then you’ll survive, but hundreds of millions of Americans won’t.

    How about you turn your attention to his Social Security numberS. We cajn start a conversation on that. See the videos and article I just posted. I’m interested to see if you have a canned response to that situation.

  7. Ellen on said:

    Re: “If the guy (not man) himself came up to you and showed you his Kenyan birth certificate, you’d tell him he was wrong…”

    When someone has a birth certificate from Hawaii, and birth notices in Hawaii, and no proof that his mother was ever in Kenya and only 21 people came to the USA from Kenya in that year it is a billion to one more likely that he was born in Hawaii than in Kenya.

    Re: “I recently wrote an article for The DC Post, in which I said, essentially, that it does not matter whether you believe that gravity doesn’t exist, which means you can fly. When you jump off a 6 story building, secure in the belief you can fly, the base line truths of the situation will click in, and you will be splattered on the concrete, beliefs and all.”

    We are in total agreement. And when you have a birth certificate from Hawaii and no proof that your mother was ever in Kenya you are likely to have been born in Hawaii. This is as obvious as gravitation.

    Re: “Your Barack guy will take you down with the rest of us, if we don’t stop him, unless yhou are one of his inner circle people who has made huge amounts of taxpayer money through his corrupt policies. Then you’ll survive, but hundreds of millions of Americans won’t.”

    There are obviously plenty of good reasons to vote against Obama, and I would fight to the death for your right to do so. But Obama having been born in Kenya is not one of those reasons. It isn’t true. It isn’t even likely.

    Re Social Security numbers:

    The Connecticut SS number was caused by a data entry error. SS numbers were generated by the zip code of the applicant’s address. Obama’s address in Hawaii was in zip code 96814, and the zip code for Danbury, CT. is 06814.

    Millions of people have multiple social security numbers caused mainly by data entry errors:

    http://www.cnbc.com/id/38678753/How_Many_Social_Security_Numbers_Do_You_Have

    http://www.securityworldnews.com/2010/08/12/20-million-americans-have-multiple-social-security-numbers-associated-with-their-name/

    http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-501465_162-20013733-501465.html

    You might well ask why, if there is evidence that Obama has multiple SS numbers and that one of them came from Connecticut that NO committee in Congress wants to investigate? Why not?

    Because it is not illegal to have mistakes in your SS files, and lots of people do. And there is no evidence that this is other than a mistake, or a lot of mistakes.

    Republicans would be GLAD to hold a hearing to show that there was a crime involved with Obama’s SS number. But they KNOW that there is no evidence of fraud, just of errors, and if they looked into their own files (I did to mine), they are likely to find multiple numbers in them. Have you looked at your Social Security file?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

HTML tags are not allowed.